The IESG wrote, On 2009-04-27 06:58 PDT: > The IESG has received a request from the smime WG (smime) to consider > the following document: > > - 'Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) ' > RFC 3852 as a Draft Standard > > No technical issues were raised during the first Last Call. However, the > Last Call failed to highlight two normative references to standards track > documents of lower maturity: RFCs 3280 and 3281.
lower maturity? Did you perhaps mean "greater maturity" or "lower number" ? _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
