On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 03:04:19PM +0200, Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> wrote a message of 30 lines which said:
> I thought TCP was the default when the UDP message size is not > enough. Well, in theory, it should be EDNS0 (standardized in the previous century) but, in practice, it has deployment issues, like everything which was invented after Jon Postel's death. > It seems that DNS over SCTP would solve 90% of the problems with 10% > of the efforts and resources required to implement DNSSEC. However, > I hear more often about the latter than the former. How come? I've read this message via the IETF general mailing list and so I missed the beginning. In what way can you compare DNSSEC (which provides object security) and SCTP or TCP (which provide a better channel security for DNS)? _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
