Andrew Sullivan <a...@shinkuro.com> writes: > On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 08:10:55AM +0900, Masataka Ohta wrote: > >> In general, registries welcome DNSSEC, no matter how secure it is, >> as long as its complicated operation works as an excuse to increase >> (or not to reduce) registration charge and registries' revenue. > > That is a serious charge. I've seen no evidence that DNSSEC > represents a revenue opportunity for registries. On the contrary, so > far as I've seen, most registries are introducing it without any fee, > even though it represents a substantial additional operational cost.
The organization operating .SE charges for DNSSEC. According to [1] it costs 250 SEK annually (~22 EUR or ~30 USD) extra per year to protect a domain name with DNSSEC. /Simon [1] http://www.iis.se/docs/se-dnssec_-_broschyr_eng_ny_.pdf _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
