-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I do not debate the utility to the Nomcom of this change.
I believe it comes with a cost, and I do not agree that it is a simple decision. I do not agree that the Nomcom is the only party here worth consideration. Joe Stephen Kent wrote: > Joe, > > Having served on NOMCOM more than once, and having been solicited for > inputs every year, I much prefer publishing the names of folks have > consented to be considered for IAB and IESG positions. The addition of > "ringers" to lists that are sent out (to hide the identities of the true > candidates) wastes the time of a lot of folks who are asked to provide > feedback on these non-candidates. It also means that someone who is a > real candidate may not receive feedback because people assume the > individual is a ringer! > > Steve -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkoxo8kACgkQE5f5cImnZrtsewCeLOjG5iIYRgfDCbSHxiVw/GE1 ZFUAn39X8Z3OPmAm8lSFgdP/2AAwtPjY =8ZBh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
