El Jue 16 Jul 2009 21:15:29 Mark Nottingham escribió: > All of that said, it's pretty clear that despite good practice and > separation of concerns, people are going to want to do this whether we > like it or not. Therefore, I'm inclined to loosen this requirement to > SHOULD NOT (or even degrade it to a non-normative recommendation > against) making extension (NOT registered) relation types format- > specific. > > The benefit here is that doing this encourages application-specific > relation types to be defined as extensions, which is their nominated > purpose.
I'd lower it to SHOULD NOT, not to a non-normative recommendation. I think "the full implications must be understood and carefully weighed before choosing" to define a relation type that limits the target media type :) (quoted text from BCP 14) _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
