The NTP protocol is inappropriately ONLY adding functionality for other
protocols which are already hosted by the entity hosting the NTPWG work
and as such this is a HUGE conflict of interest without adding NTP to
NEA and other protocols.
Todd Glassey
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [ntpwg] Last Call: draft-ietf-ntp-dhcpv6-ntp-opt (Network Time
Protocol (NTP) Server Option for DHCPv6) to Proposed Standard
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 07:04:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: The IESG <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: IETF-Announce <[email protected]>
CC: [email protected]
The IESG has received a request from the Network Time Protocol WG (ntp)
to consider the following document:
- 'Network Time Protocol (NTP) Server Option for DHCPv6 '
<draft-ietf-ntp-dhcpv6-ntp-opt-04.txt> as a Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
[email protected] mailing lists by 2009-08-17. Exceptionally,
comments may be sent to [email protected] instead. In either case, please
retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
The file can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ntp-dhcpv6-ntp-opt-04.txt
IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=17276&rfc_flag=0
_______________________________________________
ntpwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/ntpwg
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.42/2278 - Release Date: 08/02/09
17:56:00
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf