The NTP protocol is inappropriately ONLY adding functionality for other protocols which are already hosted by the entity hosting the NTPWG work and as such this is a HUGE conflict of interest without adding NTP to NEA and other protocols.

Todd Glassey

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [ntpwg] Last Call: draft-ietf-ntp-dhcpv6-ntp-opt (Network Time Protocol (NTP) Server Option for DHCPv6) to Proposed Standard
Date:   Mon, 3 Aug 2009 07:04:09 -0700 (PDT)
From:   The IESG <[email protected]>
Reply-To:       [email protected]
To:     IETF-Announce <[email protected]>
CC:     [email protected]



The IESG has received a request from the Network Time Protocol WG (ntp) to consider the following document:

- 'Network Time Protocol (NTP) Server Option for DHCPv6 '
  <draft-ietf-ntp-dhcpv6-ntp-opt-04.txt> as a Proposed Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action.  Please send substantive comments to the
[email protected] mailing lists by 2009-08-17. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to [email protected] instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

The file can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ntp-dhcpv6-ntp-opt-04.txt


IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=17276&rfc_flag=0

_______________________________________________
ntpwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/ntpwg

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.42/2278 - Release Date: 08/02/09 
17:56:00

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Reply via email to