Thomas Narten <[email protected]> writes: > Without taking positions on the specifics of the appeal or the > response, I have to say that my take on the response is that it > doesn't properly address the appeal and is inadequate. > > I would have expected the specific issues raised in the appeal to be > responded to in a direct manner, with a clear response as to whether > the point is agreed to (or not) and what (if any) remedy is > forthcoming. > > Instead, the response smacks of trying not to respond directly to the > appeal, but say "here is what we have been doing, let's please just > move on". IMO, that just doesn't cut it. > > IMO, an appeal needs to be responded to with directness and with > clarity.
You saved me the time to compose a lengthier response, and instead I can just +1 yours. /Simon _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
