Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> You say: "scope of the document is seemingly wrong."
>
> Well, the scope of the document is to discuss how actual networks
> running IPv4 and IPv6 can deal with renumbering.
So, it's a wrong scope.
> That can't be "wrong";
It can be wrong.
The reality, instead, is that actual networks running IPv4 and IPv6
***CAN'T*** deal with renumbering, because of their inertia.
> it is simply what we chose to write about.
I'm saying that is a poor selection only to produce poor documents.
If you don't mind, feel free to produce the poor documents.
> If you'd like to start a thread about IPng, can you use a different
> subject header please?
I'm afraid, considering the so poor quality of IPv6, IETF has already
lost power to produce IPngs.
Masataka Ohta
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
