Russ, I think the point is that the IESG should probably refer the doc to the uri-review team to look for any red flags. Mistakes in URI specs are common (speaking has one that has made some).
Eliot On 9/30/09 9:51 PM, Russ Housley wrote: > Ted: > >> Just out of curiousity, why is this registering it as provisional, >> rather than permanent scheme? > > There is not a rsync protocol specification and URI scheme. The > protocol is widely deployed. In fact the IETF depends on it > everyday. This document is intended to provide a citable > specification for the URL scheme, but not the protocol. Without the > protocol specification, provisional seemed like the best choice based > on RFC 4395. > > Russ > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
