Thank you Ben for reviewing and taking the time to go through the
document once more!
Agreed; Sorry, I missed that one.

I will make sure it is included in the next revision. I am sure you are
okay not to spin another revision unless this is the only outstanding
comment.

Thanks again!

Regards,
Ahmad
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Campbell [mailto:b...@nostrum.com] 
> Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 2:47 PM
> To: Muhanna, Ahmad (RICH1:2H10)
> Cc: Khalil, Mohamed (RICH2:2S20); sgund...@cisco.com; 
> kchowdh...@starentnetworks.com; pyeg...@juniper.net; General 
> Area Review Team; IETF-Discussion list; Jari Arkko; 
> marc...@it.uc3m.es; Julien Laganier
> Subject: Followup on Gen-ART review of 
> draft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation (was Re: Gen-ART LC and 
> Telechat Review of draft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation-10)
> 
> Hi,
> 
> This is a followup of my Gen-ART review of 
> draft-ietf-mext-binding- revocation, updated based on 
> revision 13 of that draft.
> 
> This revision addresses all of my substantive issues, and 
> most of the editorial issues. I had one outstanding minor 
> editorial comment where the author proposed a specific 
> change, but that change did not make it into revision 13 as 
> far as I can tell:
> 
> >>
> >> -- Section 11, (InitMINDelayBRIs) (I think I commented on 
> this, but 
> >> can't find the resolution)
> >>
> >> Did you intend for the _default_ to be a range (between .5 and 1 
> >> sec), or did you mean to say the default was 1 second, and it must 
> >> not be configured to less than .5 seconds? I suspect the 
> latter, but 
> >> it's not clear from the text.
> >
> > [Ahmad]
> > Sure, will fix this as follows:
> >
> >   Initial Minimum Delay Between BRI messages (InitMINDelayBRIs)
> >
> >      This variable specifies the initial delay timeout in seconds
> >      before the revoking mobility entity retransmits a BRI message.
> >      The default is 1 second but not to be configured less than 0.5 
> > seconds.
> 
> Revision 13 still appears to have the old text.
> 
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Ben.
> 
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Reply via email to