2009/10/9 Michael StJohns <mstjo...@comcast.net> > So no, we're not treating China unfairly in this discussion. We're not > holding China to a higher standard, we're questioning - as we must for due > diligence - whether the standard to which they want to hold the IETF is too > high or too disjoint from the normal set of standards and practices for IETF > meetings.
Since the IETF discusses how to make the Internet work better, the only reason why IETF members could feel worried is that they would intend to discuss how to build a better working Internet that would be prohibited in China? Either this means considering splitting the Internet from 1/3 of its users. Or that the IETF can develop standards that do not take local users' legitimate and/or legal needs into consideration. Or did I miss something? What about the legality of a similar case in the USA? Patrick Suger
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
