Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
>> Only if IPv6 were worth deploying.
> Isn't this a little... late? A few hundred million devices are deployed
> with IPv6, including all the commonly deployed versions of Windows and
> IOS. By comparison, here's an overview of how an alternative might fare:
Within IETF, maybe. As ITU, these days, is doing much better than
IETF that IPng could better be discussed there or somewhere else.
> 6. On the Tuesday of IETF80 the IANA switches to armageddon rules and
> transfers the last ten /8s to RIRs.
Can you say NAT and unicast class E?
Masataka Ohta
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
