"Todd Glassey" <tglassey at earthlink dot net> wrote:
in reading section 4a of BCP79 it raises a specific set of questions - the first of those being per this section it seems to me that a new IPR Header Page needs to be formally added to the RFC template and to the I-D template as well;
I read Russ's response about the pointer as a glimmer of hope that there will NOT be a whole new page of legalese added to every RFC and I-D. For those of us who are not lawyers or corporations specializing in IPR, the signal-to-noise ratio here is getting a bit ridiculous.
-- Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | http://www.ewellic.org RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 | ietf-languages @ http://is.gd/2kf0s _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
