On Mon, 28 Dec 2009, John Levine wrote: > But I see little wisdom in adding another does-not-exist name with > semantics not meaningfully different from .INVALID or FOO.INVALID.
I think the semantics are meaningfully different, in that applications are allowed to know that .invalid is special, but should not know that sink.arpa (or nonexistent.arpa) is special. --apb (Alan Barrett) _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
