On 2010-01-04, at 22:09, John R. Levine wrote: >>> It would still be nice to put in an explanation of the motivation for >>> adding SINK.ARPA when its semantics and operations, at least for clients, >>> appear identical to whatever.INVALID. >> >> I don't know that I have anything much to add to my previous answers to that >> question. > > Well, at this point there seems to be no practical difference at all between > the two, which returns to the question of why we need two different ways to > do the same thing.
And again, I have no additional answers beyond the ones I gave before. I suspect the IESG have sufficient data on this particular point to be able to make their own decision without either of us repeating ourselves further. Joe http://www.ietf.org/ibin/c5i?mid=6&rid=49&gid=0&k1=933&k2=49793&tid=1262672174 http://www.ietf.org/ibin/c5i?mid=6&rid=49&gid=0&k1=933&k2=49795&tid=1262672094 _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
