Andrew G. Malis wrote: > I appreciate the potential difficulty of guaranteeing the unencumbered > status of any output of this group. However, I would like this statement to > be stronger, saying that this group will only produce a new codec if it is > strongly believed by WG rough consensus to either be unencumbered, > or freely licensed by the IPR holder(s), if any.
For political reasons, this is unlikely to happen. Instead, I hope you will participate in the WG. Then that rough consensus will depend on your opinion (roughly). --Ben
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
