Kemp, David P. wrote: > > Rationale: > > Version -01 states that the semantics of SCSV is identical to the > semantics an empty RI, namely: "this client is capable of supporting > secure renegotiation, and this ClientHello message is an initial > handshake, not a renegotiation handshake."
But you do realize that we discussed this issue on the WG mailing list and the I provided an explanation along the lines of a semi-formal correctness proof that this rationale is based on a misunderstanding and a poor choice of words in the specification. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg05466.html -Martin _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
