> Our process may be complicated, but a deviation from due process > that requires 145 pages of description is simply not possible. > We have specific rules in RFC 2026 and RFC 2418 (and various updates) > and it should be possible to describe specific alleged deviations > from those rules in a page or two. If the appeal merely reflects > the fact that the appellant disagrees with the WG consensus, > that is not a ground for appeal. > > I do not believe the IESG is under any obligation to spend its > precious time digesting such a mass of text to discern any > actual grounds for appeal. > > Brian
+1 Ran _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
