I've come across a RFC which basically says, "in order to do X safely, perform checks Y before you do X". It turns out that it's possible to evade those checks. What should I do about it? I've already contacted the author, and he says that no update to the RFC is planned. Should i just file an errata? The problem is not really critical, fortunately.
(The nature of the protocol makes it pretty much impossible to notify implementers privately.) _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
