So you would argue that RFCs should normally be used in paper form? This is the only way I can see to avoid requiring internet access.
This idea seems sane to me. Given the current policy, the documents are already not usable on the hundreds of millions of net-capable mobile devices; a high quality paper version would avoid making the false promise that RFCs are "available online". On Mar 20, 2010 11:18 AM, "Donald Eastlake" <[email protected]> wrote: On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Martin Rex <[email protected]> wrote: > > ... > > > > > And if we should change anything about the Author's Address section, > then it would be to... No. I have no problem with *supplementing* it with such a URL but any author listed on the front page should have an email address, a postal address, and a telephone number listed in the RFC. The model for an RFC is that of a permanent book, not an ephemeral web page. I am opposed to the migration of more of RFC content to links requiring Internet access and perpetual maintenance. > ... > > -Martin > Donald _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
