> > Multiple-days should be allowed ... Sure!
BR, Haibin it makes no sense to offer day > passes > to folks with just one day to attend but not to those with 2 or > even 3. I > used a day pass this year and didn't participate in a 2nd WG > because two > day passes weren't allowed. Don't know if I could justify paying > the full > week fee if a Day pass wasn't offered. If I'd been allowed to have > 2 day > passes, I'd have contributed 10x the green dot campaign value. > > On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Danny McPherson wrote: > > > > > Figured I'd be the one to kick a thread off on this fascinating > topic :-) > > > > I like the idea of day passes, it's not just about the cost of > the day pass and all it avails, if someone is only coming to the > IETF meeting for a day (e.g., they only want a day pass because > they have a time constraining day job or actual fiscal > constraints), then why should they be required to pay a fee to > subsidize meeting costs for the entire week? > > > > The work happens on the mailing lists, consensus is judged on > the mailing list, and remote participation is encouraged as well. > > > > And if you buy a day pass, you should certainly be nomcom eligible. > > > > -danny > > _______________________________________________ > > Ietf mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
