> The ISD proposal > required the IESG spend a lot of time that the individuals simply did > not have.
so the IESG insisted - that was not the opinion of the newtrk chair (who thought that ISDs would likely reduce the load on ADs > Further, this came at a very, very bad time and that, apparently, kept (at least some) members of the IESG from seriously considering what was being proposed this was not the IESG's finest hour - lets leave it at that Scott (ex) newtrk chair _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
