Phillip, On Jun 25, 2010, at 10:06 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote: > Am I the only person that thinks that if shaving 50ms off HTTP latency is a > worthwhile goal it would be more appropriate to look at a DNS based signaling > mechanism that is going to support that goal (and also do the right thing for > IPv4/6) rather than look at various ways to coax the desired behavior from > the legacy infrastructure.
How would a DNS-based signaling mechanism work when DNS servers do not necessarily know anything about the state of connectivity to the server they provide name service for? Regards, -drc _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
