On Jun 29, 2010, at 3:25 AM, Elwell, John wrote: > Cullen, > > Whilst neither agreeing nor disagreeing with the charter, I did not find > anything in the charter that said the information had to be in the SIP header > rather than in the body. On what basis do you make that deduction? > > John
When I read 5. SIP elements may need to apply policy about passing and screening the information. And the discussion about it's not just UA. I reached that perhaps flawed conclusion that proxies needed to be able to change the information when "screening" and thus it needed to be in a header. Note I would have far less of an issue with an opaque container for proprietary information if it was in a body instead of a header and had the types of constraints that SIP-T has. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
