Actually, I wish we had done something in this area sooner in the hope
of creating a forcing function to make the authentication mechanisms
in WiFi more appropriate.

It has taken ten years for WiFi to get to a state where an adequate
credential mechanism is supported, and it is still clunky. And they
still don't have a decent mechanism to support the typical coffee shop
type access mode.


On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Fred Baker <[email protected]> wrote:
> While it is new in IETF meetings, it is far from unusual in WiFi networks to 
> find some form of authentication. This happens at coffee shops, college 
> campuses, corporate campuses, and people's apartments. I think I would need 
> some more data before I concluded this was unreasonable.
>
> On Jul 1, 2010, at 8:08 AM, SM wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> At 14:55 30-06-10, IETF Chair wrote:
>>> I am writing to let you know about a change in the IETF meeting network.
>>> At IETF 79 in Beijing, the IETF network will be connected to the open
>>> Internet with absolutely no filtering.  However, we have agreed with our
>>> hosts that only IETF meeting participants will have access to the
>>> network.  Following sound engineering practices, we will deploy
>>> admission control mechanisms as part of the IETF 78 meeting network in
>>> Maastricht to ensure that they are working properly before they are
>>> mission critical.
>>
>> Most IETF participants probably know that the consensus of the IETF is 
>> documented through BCPs and other Standards Track RFCs.  If the text in the 
>> RFC isn't clear, there is room for disagreement.  If it is ill-defined, 
>> someone will go and find the loophole.  If the above text was in a BCP, we 
>> could nit on the definition of IETF meeting participants.  It is clear to 
>> people unfamiliar with the IETF that IETF meeting participants means people 
>> who have registered for the IETF meeting.
>>
>> I have been told that an IETF meeting does not have security guards at the 
>> door to verify who has a badge to determine whether the person is registered 
>> for the meeting.  If someone walks into an IETF meeting, the person can 
>> enjoy the cookie for free and even provide a contribution at the mic.  The 
>> person enjoys the same privileges as people who have paid for meeting 
>> attendance fee.
>>
>> I'll take the opportunity to thank Karen O'Donoghue for keeping the IAOC 
>> minutes up to date.  The IAB could do with some help in that area.
>>
>> Some of you may recall that the Beijing venue contract was discussed on this 
>> mailing list last year.  It resulted in some resolutions as follows:
>>
>> "Whereas the Host has assured the IAOC that 'a normal IETF
>>  meeting can be legally held in China and that no pre-screening
>>  of material or monitoring of session content is required or will
>>  be done,'
>>
>>  Whereas the IAOC, based on the assurances of the Host and a
>>  history of the venue successfully hosting major international
>>  conferences that relate to our industry, believes a normal IETF
>>  meeting can be held at the venue,
>>
>>  Whereas the IAOC heard all arguments made on the list, and
>>  made its determination on the ability to hold a successful
>>  meeting i.e. run it in a fashion as we always have, using the
>>  tools that we always have, with a critical mass of the
>>  traditional participants, discussing the usual topics."
>>
>> The fashion in the IETF is to have an open network.  There isn't any 
>> admission control and credentials are not required to enjoy the benefit of 
>> free and full Internet access.  The IETF may run out of cookies; it never 
>> runs out of bandwidth.
>>
>>> I am writing to let you know what to expect in both Maastricht and Beijing.
>>
>> And it is expected that the comments on this thread will follow sound IETF 
>> practices when it comes to mailing list discussions. :-)
>>
>> Regards,
>> -sm
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ietf mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>
> http://www.ipinc.net/IPv4.GIF
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>



-- 
Website: http://hallambaker.com/
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Reply via email to