Yeah. Sigh. I guess the issue then becomes whether this is enough of a step in right direction that it can be built on - and whether it's worth the effort.
Cullen/Jonathan - can you speak to any of the operational issues w.r.t. 'failure surprise' in the existing implementation? Regards, Peter Musgrave On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Adam Roach <[email protected]> wrote: > On 7/6/10 7:20 AM, Peter Musgrave wrote: > >> From my perspective what this is really about is the ability for me to >> have interoperable ad-hoc video calls between businesses which can be >> established via SIP with a "good enough" level of authentication and >> security. >> > > > You're looking in the wrong place, then. > > The problem is that VIPR really provides something more like "random > failure surprise," as some portion of the call attempts must go over the > (non-video-capable) PSTN. The user doesn't have any idea about, or control > over, when this will happen. So while it might be something you could use > for personal purposes -- where frequent video call setup failures would be > okay -- I doubt it's a viable video solution in a business environment. To > run a business, you need something better than "random failure surprise". > > /a >
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
