Adrian,
On Sep 13, 2010, at 9:39 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> Several interesting responses, thanks.
>
> I agree that detailed rules would be onerous and unable to cope with the
> exceptional circumstances that the condition is intended to cover.
>
> On the other hand BCP101 does seem to require some rules.
Right, the additional rules we were proposing are:
In furtherance of this requirement expenses for members of the IAOC may be
reimbursed
upon approval of the IAOC Chair, or by a consensus of the IAOC, for
exceptional cases only.
> Dave said:
>
>> There are enough hassles for the IAOC tasks; let's wait to impose stricter
>> rules until we see clear evidence they are needed.
>
> OK, I think that provides a way forward. Let's put in place a mechanisms that
> allows the flexibility (i.e., not change to the "under exceptional
> circumstances" and "with agreement of the IAOC chair or the IAOC"), but
> remove the risk of surprise by inserting "with prior agreement", and supply a
> way of determining whether stricter rules are needed by requiring "annual
> reporting of expenses paid".
To me "exceptional cases" also implies unplanned. It would be nice to still
have this flexibility.
Bob
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
