I'm not closely involved with ROLL but I am working on devices using the CORE 
work that would likely make use of and depend on this protocol. I have some 
concerns about the practically of using ROLL given the IPR. My understanding of 
the IPR is that one would be required to use certificates that are from an CA 
license by Certicom. 

My belief is that the many of the low cost devices that would want to implement 
ROLL would be based on Linux implementation as that has become one of the most 
widely used operating systems for low cost networking devices such as 
residential routers. Given the optimal ways of integrating a protocol such as 
this into the kernel, and the issues of likening such as this in GPL code, I 
really wonder if the current IPR will be a major determent to deployment of 
ROLL. It's not easy to search the archives and I easily could have missed 
things but I can not find any significant discussion of it the WG could avoid 
this IPR. There were a few emails in July but it did not seem like it really 
hit this topic.  I would have expected to see discussion on such topics as 
David McGrews draft on Fundamental Elliptic Curve Cryptography Algorithms or 
perhaps using  RSA approaches.  I think discussion about this IPR, and ways it 
could be avoided, would be appropriate before approving this draft. 

Cullen 



On Aug 18, 2010, at 4:28 PM, The IESG wrote:

> 
> The IESG has received a request from the Routing Over Low power and Lossy
> networks WG (roll) to consider the following document:
> - 'RPL: IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low power and Lossy Networks'
>  <draft-ietf-roll-rpl-11.txt> as a Proposed Standard
> 
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> [email protected] mailing lists by 2010-09-01. Exceptionally, comments may be
> sent to [email protected] instead. In either case, please retain the
> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
> 
> The file can be obtained via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-rpl/
> 
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-rpl/
> 
> 
> The following IPR Declarations may be related to this I-D:
> 
> /ipr/1270/
> /ipr/1356/
> /ipr/1366/
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll


Cullen Jennings
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Reply via email to