+1 On Oct 8, 2010, at 1:02 PM, james woodyatt wrote:
> everyone-- > > IPv6 may have been born with a developmental disability, but we're not > dealing with a corpse yet. The patient is still alive, getting better, and > with a bit of love and proper care, might yet grow up to make better and > brighter music than IPv4. > > Maybe I'm being overly sentimental and using anthropomorphism inappropriately > here, but really folks-- isn't it a bit unseemly to be arguing over how we > went so "wrong" with IPv6-- and how we could do ever so much better the > *next* time we get to reinvent the Internet if we avoid all the killing > mistakes we made in bringing IPv6 up-- while there are, today, more people > than ever before taking what are perceived to be enormous risks actually > making the v4->v6 transition start to happen? > > > -- > james woodyatt <[email protected]> > member of technical staff, communications engineering > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
