I would be quite curious to know your definition of failure, given that IPsec is currently deployed, and working in "more than a few" deployments ...
On a possibly related note, IPv6 use deployed and working too ... /TJ On Oct 27, 2010 12:08 PM, "Masataka Ohta" <[email protected]> wrote: > Steven Bellovin wrote: > >> The core issue was indeed that IPsec was mandated for v6. We >> were *very* overoptimistic about how long it would take before >> roll-out started in earnest. In fact, we underestimated how >> long it would take to get good specs for all the important >> pieces. We also underestimated how long IPsec would take, >> though that was partially (but only partially) because IPsec >> version 1 (RFCs 1825-1829) had to be thrown away. > > Quite simply, it is merely that IPsec had totally failed long > before IPv6 totally failed. > > FYI, total failure of IPsec is not the only reason of total > failure of IPv6. > > Masataka Ohta > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
