On 30.12.2010 21:25, Tony Finch wrote:
On 30 Dec 2010, at 11:43, Phillip Hallam-Baker<[email protected]> wrote:
As a document format, the XML2RFC format is terrible. It uses all the
abominable features of SGML. Rather disappointingly for a format intended for
use by a standards organization it is different to HTML in ways that serve no
purpose other than to prevent the use of widely available tools.
Two key features that xml2rfc provides that HTML does not are automatic tables
of contents and expansion of references from a central bibliography. You seem
to think the latter is at least worth keeping and improving.
...
- (checked) cross-references
- index generation
- boilerplate generation
...
Best regards, Julian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
