What is? I generally reserve change control over non WG IDs because I have experienced people hijacking a draft, changing the principles entirely and adding their name.
Since there is an explicit allowance for that in the IPR regime, I don't see why this would be an issue. On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 5:20 PM, SM <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > This is the second time in a year that I came across a case where a > non-IETF group sought to maintain change control over a draft. In the first > case, several iterations of the draft were posted and the author solicited > comments on an IETF mailing list. > > (a) By making an IETF Submission, is an author allowing the IETF to have > change control on the work? > > (b) Is it appropriate to use a WG mailing list to discuss a work on > which the IETF does not have change control? > > (c) If the IETF Submission is covered by the WG Charter, can the WG > enhance the original contribution in accordance with the IETF > Standards Process by adopting it as a WG work item? > > Regards, > -sm > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > -- Website: http://hallambaker.com/
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
