I've made this change in our working copy. On 2011-1-21, at 14:50, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
> t.petch skrev 2011-01-21 12:43: >> I would like to see more clarity in 8.1 >> " For assignments done through IETF-published RFCs, the Contact will be the >> IESG." >> in that I am unclear what IETF-published RFCs are; presumably that is >> Standards >> Track, BCP >> and Individual Submissions, but not Independent Submissions or IRTF RFC. >> >> I think that the terminology here should follow that of RFC4844 with a >> reference >> thereto. >> > > I guess we should use the "IETF Stream", and I do agree that a reference > for the definition of that should be included.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
