On Jan 27, 2011, at 8:12 , IETF Chair wrote: > > Originally, two ports were assigned for plain and over-TLS, which for HTTP > mapped to two different URL schemes: http and https. > > Many people thought that this was a waste of a port, and the STARTTLS > approach was developed. You say that it does not work in some cases, and you > seem to be suggesting that we go back to the original way. > > Maybe it works in some cases and not others. Can we say which is which?
I did misread the draft as saying that 2 ports were not allowed when clearly that was not what people meant but ... I'm mostly concerned about cases where latency or bandwidth are an issue - basically protocols for real time protocols for internet of things. For things like email I'm less concerned. However, I think we can make some observation about which works best. Consider some of the most successful protocols on the internet http, 2 ports email, pop, imap, and smtp, - more use on multi ports than STARTLS though many deployment support both sip, 2 ports _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
