Agreed. On Mar 24, 2011, at 12:13 PM, Bob Hinden wrote:
> > On Mar 24, 2011, at 5:01 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote: > >> >> >> On 3/24/2011 4:49 PM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:> >>>>> Another proposal as for your document. So, it fails to mention what are >>>>> the procedures for reclassification of Standards Track RFCs to Historic. >> >> >> Generally, the document tries to limit itself to discussion of what it >> changes. >> >> There are no changes proposed for moving to Historic. (The question of >> Historic has not been part of the many discussions about streamlining the >> standards labeling.) >> >> Hence that issue is out of scope for the document. > > +1 > > Bob > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
