On 4/22/2011 7:54 AM, Dan Harkins wrote:

> 
>   Hi Mykyta,
> 
>   Thank you for reviewing my draft. Responses inline....
> 
> On Sat, March 26, 2011 10:06 pm, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> A question on the flowing extract:
>>
>>> This memo contains a new numberspace to be managed by IANA, a
>>>     registry used to indicate a password preprocessing technique.  The
>>>     initial layout of this registry SHALL be:
>>>
>>>     o   0x00 : None
>>>
>>>     o   0x01 :RFC2759  <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2759>
>>>
>>>     o   0x02 : SASLprep
>>>
>>>     The Prep field is 8 bits long and all other values are available
>>>     through assignment by IANA.  IANA is instructed to assign values
>>>     based on "Specification Required" (see [RFC5226
>>> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5226>]).
>> It contains the description of new registry. but it fails to give it the
>> distinctive definition.  Among other, what is the exact name of the
>> registry?  How are the fields named?  The sentence "The Prep field is 8
>> bits long and all other values are available through assignment by
>> IANA." also makes me confusing.  This means that the Prep field is not
>> assigned by IANA?  Finally, 0x00 is Unassigned or Reserved?
>>
>> Thus, this extract needs more clarification.
> 
>   How would the following look to you:
> 
>   "This memo contains a new numberspace to be managed by IANA, the
>    password preprocessing method (Prep) registry. The initial layout
>    of this registry SHALL be:
> 
>    o   0x00 : None (no preprocessing is performed)
> 
>    o   0x01 : RFC2759
> 
>    o   0x02 : SASLprep
> 
>    The Prep field is 8 bits long and all other values are available
>    through assignment by IANA.  IANA is instructed to assign values
>    based on "Specification Required" (see [RFC5226])."

This looks strangely familiar ;-).  From RFC 5931:

 The following is the initial layout for the password pre-processing
 method registry:

   o   0x00 : None

   o   0x01 : RFC2759

   o   0x02 : SASLprep

   The Prep field is 8 bits long, and all other values are available
   through assignment by IANA.  IANA is instructed to assign values
   based on "Specification Required" (see [RFC5226]).

Is there some good reason not to use the IANA Registry already
established
(http://www.iana.org/assignments/eap-pwd-parameters/eap-pwd-parameters.xml#eap-pwd-parameters-4)?

<<attachment: gwz.vcf>>

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Reply via email to