> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John > Levine > Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2011 5:39 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-10.txt> (DKIM And > Mailing Lists) to BCP > > [...] > I'd suggest publishing it as Informational or Experimental rather than > BCP.
It originally started out as Informational but there was at some point WG consensus to shift it to using normative language, making BCP the appropriate status. I don't think I'd object to going back to Informational. I imagine I can get the diffs out of RCS and just play them backwards if that's the way we decide to go. -MSK _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
