On May 30, 2011, at 11:09 PM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote: > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Gert Doering <[email protected]> wrote: > I have no idea what a "v6 DNS ACL" should be, except maybe an ACL that > protects which IPv6 clients are allowed to talk to a DNS server. > > ACL is the wrong term. Saying it's an ACL makes it easy to make the argument > that whoever is implementing this is denying access to a particular resource > (the AAAA record). > > In fact, the opposite is true - by electing not to return an AAAA record, the > implementer is able to allow access to a particular resource (the content > that the user wants to reach) instead of publishing the resource over IPv6 > where some users can't usefully reach it. > > Which is of course, the root of the problem here. It is the reason why many > large website operators have either implemented whitelisting (Google, > Facebook) or have announced that they will be implementing whitelisting > (Yahoo, Akamai). And it is the reason why said website operators are not > contributing to this document.
But you've contributed to this document, so have others from that list. > _______________________________________________ > v6ops mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
