On 7 Jun 2011, at 07:33, Gert Doering wrote: > > Do we really need to go through all this again? > > As long as there is no Internet Overlord that can command people to > a) put up relays everywhere and b) ensure that these relays are working, > 6to4 as a general mechanism for attachment to the IPv6 Internet is FAIL. > > If someone wants to use 6to4 to interconnect his machines over an IPv4 > infrastructure (=6to4 on both ends), nobody is taking this away. > > Gert Doering > -- NetMaster
Exactly. Less than 1% of the IPv6 traffic reaching us is 6to4. And 6to4 in its 6to4-to-native mode is proven to be highly unreliable. It seems highly preferable to have that 1% wait for native IPv6 to be available to them, rather than being used as a reason by the bigger content providers for holding back production deployment, which is what we all want to see. It's time to remove the stabilisers on the IPv6 bicycle. Tim _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
