>>>>> "Lorenzo" == Lorenzo Colitti <[email protected]> writes:
>> Why are you trying to make life harder for developers of IPv6
>> applications? There's no reason at all that an application
>> developer should have to set up a special-purpose network just to
>> test an IPv6 application.
>>
Lorenzo> No, we're trying to make their lives easier, by suggesting
Lorenzo> they use something that actually *works*.
>> Realistic testing of applications needs to be done on real
>> networks, or a least an approximation to real networks. Testing
>> IPv6 using 6to4 over public IPv4 obviously isn't perfect, but
>> it's a hell of a lot more realistic than setting up a lab network
>> and confining one's testing to that.
Lorenzo> So use a tunnel broker.
My tunnel broker has a machine with broken IPv4 routing, which they
can't fix. It's been down for a week+ now. We had to renumber that
location in time for World IPv6 day. We only had 6 machines that were
using their non-autoconfigured addresses, so the rest was just a s///g
in the DNS zone file.
6to4 would have turned this into my problem (which I could have fixed),
but since some places like google refuse to run their own 6to4 relay, I
can't really use 6to4 to talk to. Thanks.
This all reminds of how killing the mbone killed multicast.
--
] He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life! | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
then sign the petition.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
