Brian - thanks for your review and comments.

- Ralph

On Jun 10, 2011, at 10:45 PM 6/10/11, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

> Ralph,
> 
> As far as I can tell this seems to describe some sort of a Layer 2 stateful
> per-flow QoS mechanism using new Ethertype headers. As such I don't see why
> the IETF would care. The point of it escapes me, since we have plenty of 
> reason
> to believe that such solutions are impractical and do not scale, but that 
> doesn't
> seem like our problem.
> 
> I only looked at this to check if it impacted current work in 6MAN on
> the IPv6 Flow Label, and there doesn't appear to be any impact or relevance.
> 
> Regards
>   Brian Carpenter
> 
> On 2011-06-08 08:27, Ralph Droms wrote:
>> The IETF has recently received a liaison from ITU-T Q5/SG-11 regarding a 
>> Draft Recommendation.  That liaison is available as 
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1054/.  The official liaison is 
>> available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/documents/LIAISON/file1232.pdf.
>> 
>> The liaison asks for IETF review of Draft Recommendation "Signalling 
>> protocols and procedures relating to Flow State Aware QoS control in a 
>> bounded sub-network of a NGN", which is available at 
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/documents/LIAISON/file1231.pdf.  This note 
>> opens an IETF comment period on the document, ending midnight, anywhere on 
>> earth, 2011/7/5.  After the comment period, a summary will be prepared and 
>> returned in a liaison to ITU-T Q5/SG-11.
>> 
>> Of specific interest to the IETF are any ways in which the "signalling 
>> protocols and procedures" defined in the Draft Recommendation might interact 
>> with existing IETF Internet protocols.  We are especially interested in 
>> potential adverse interactions or interference with IETF Internet protocols. 
>>  The technical merits of the "signalling protocols and procedures" defined 
>> in the Draft Recommendation are of interest inasmuch as the IETF community 
>> might provide technical advice and recommendations to improve the Draft 
>> Recommendation itself.
>> 
>> Please respond with any comments on the Draft Recommendation to 
>> [email protected].  Thanks in advance for your review of the Draft 
>> Recommendation.
>> 
>> - Ralph Droms, Internet Area Director
>>  for the IESG
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ietf mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>> 

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Reply via email to