Exactly. Given that we spend most of our days in air conditioned meeting rooms, Phoenix or Dallas are not bad choices. Dallas is slightly better due to air connections. Houston is not a good choice under any circumstance IMHO - I don't think A/C can remove enough humidity to make it comfortable in July.
Personally, I have no issue with Minneapolis in November or March - again we spend most of the time in meeting rooms, so do we really care that much about the weather outside? Mary. On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:55 PM, John C Klensin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > --On Monday, June 20, 2011 13:32 -0400 Michael Richardson > <[email protected]> wrote: > > >... > > It's a peak season destination. We seem to do this a lot. > > March would be no better, but early November there would be, I > > think, low peak. > > What's a non-peak destination for July? > > Phoenix. Probably Houston or Fort Worth. Wellington or > somewhere on the South Island that doesn't attract skiers. > Amundsen-Scott base: although I doubt that they have adequate > conference facilities, yesterday's mean temperature was circa > -89F and "daytime" is still several months off. Other silly > suggestions on request (although I don't personally consider > some of the first few silly). > > john > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf >
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
