On Jun 30, 2011, at 12:17 PM, "Stephen [kiwin] PALM" <[email protected]> wrote:

> It is not for "us" to decide when a user's network is not worth expending
> any more energy on. They have deployed their network...
> and do not want to expend any more energy themselves.  If their SP deploys
> IPv6 inelegantly, the user would have a lot of frustration/work.  Which
> will generate many expensive tech support calls... and potentially lost 
> customers.

Agreed that we need to avoid any disruptions of existing networks, devices and 
deployment scenarios.  I think we should avoid expending energy on *new* 
functions for IPv4.

- Ralph

> 
> It's not the protocols... it's the DEPLOYED APPLICATIONS and DEVICES that 
> users have.
> 
> regards, kiwin
> 
> On 6/30/2011 9:11 AM, Ralph Droms (rdroms) wrote:
>> 
>> "Gone" isn't so important as "not worth expending any more energy on.". So 
>> I'm with Keith and would like to find some words like "when it doesn't take 
>> any more work."
>> 
>> - Ralph
>> 
>> On Jun 30, 2011, at 12:00 PM, "Fernando Gont"<[email protected]>  wrote:
>> 
>>> On 06/30/2011 12:46 PM, Keith Moore wrote:
>>>> I'd like for this group to relax the "wherever possible" bit, so as to not 
>>>> preclude solutions where IPv6 can do a better job than IPv4.
>>>> 
>>>> IPv4 is a dinosaur gasping for its last breaths.
>>> 
>>> Just curious: when you expect IPv4 to be gone? (including "gone" from
>>> home and enterprise networks)
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> --
>>> Fernando Gont
>>> e-mail: [email protected] || [email protected]
>>> PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> fun mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fun
>> _______________________________________________
>> fun mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fun
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Stephen [kiwin] Palm   Ph.D.                          E:  [email protected]
> Senior Technical Director                             T: +1-949-926-PALM
> Broadcom Broadband Communications Group               F: +1-949-926-7256
> Irvine, California                               W: http://www.kiwin.com
> Secondary email accounts:  [email protected]  [email protected]
> [email protected]  [email protected]  [email protected]  [email protected]
> 
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Reply via email to