yes, but if I'm not mistaken, you already had RIPv2 then. Keith
On Jul 19, 2011, at 7:38 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: > After all, we moved RIPv1 to Historic when it was still widely implemented, > and used in many networks. > Yours, > Joel > > On 7/19/2011 5:34 PM, Doug Barton wrote: >> On 07/19/2011 14:01, Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote: >>> Clearly, the view that making something historic when it's in active use is >>> offensive. No standards body could seek to stand behind their >>> specifications, or to give the impression of doing so, with such a position. >> >> Define "active use." >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
