On Jul 27, 2011, at 7:09 AM, Fred Baker wrote:

> 
> On Jul 26, 2011, at 6:49 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> 
>> Since 6to4 is a transition mechanism it has no long term future *by 
>> definition*. Even if someone chooses to design a v2, who is going to 
>> implement it?
> 
> Actually, I think one could argue pretty effectively that 6rd is 6to4-bis.

only if you're confused about the use cases for each.

Keith

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Reply via email to