In your letter dated Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:38:33 +1000 you wrote:
>In message <4e2f4491.30...@gmail.com>, Brian E Carpenter writes:
>> Of course, if implementors choose to drop the code you might not be
>> able to upgrade software versions - but hopefully by that time you
>> will have native IPv6 service anyway.
>
>Which is exactly why HISTORIC is NOT appropriate. 

With rfc3484-revise and the documented brokenness of 6to4, it doesn't make
any sense for implementors to offer 6to4 anyhow. So I think it would be
quite weird to keep 6to4 at standards track just to prevent some vendors from
dropping 6to4 support. 

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Reply via email to