On 2011-07-28 11:13, Martin Rex wrote: > Brian E Carpenter wrote: >> Responding to Glen Zorn's question in plenary: >> >> Firstly, not all ADs review all drafts - that's why you will see >> numerous "no objection" or missing ballot responses. > > I can understand the resource contention when reading drafts > brought to the IESG. I would not expect that more than 25% of > the IESG members have reviewed a draft (no average) when it is > up for ballot. But for _standards_action_, I would probably > appreciate if there was a minimum requirement of "yes" ballots > (definitely more than just one) based on independently formed > opinions, which requires some level of review of a document.
See http://www.ietf.org/iesg/voting-procedures.html Brian _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
