> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Richard Shockey > Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 7:19 AM > To: 'IETF Discussion' > Subject: RE: Review of: draft-ietf-iab-draft-iab-dns-applications-02 > > I would like to add my support here to Dave Crocker's very thoughtful and > IMHO accurate description of this revised draft. I share his views that the > substantive criticisms have not been addressed.
+1. In particular, I'm missing what important message this draft presents that is not already discussed in RFC5507. > If there are issues with new uses of the DNS, DNSEXT or DNSOPS are fully > chartered to provide community review and do not need any "fuzzy" guidance > on what is and is not acceptable. This entire draft could beeasily > simplified byt a one sentence statement. > > "If you need to do database look ups in the future we would prefer that you > think of using protocols other than the DNS." Right, and it's not clear to me we need a full IAB document stating that. And, there are plenty of people on the DNS Directorate as well as others scattered throughout the IETF that make this point on a regular basis already. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
