> -----Original Message----- > From: John C Klensin [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2011 9:19 AM > To: Murray S. Kucherawy; [email protected] > Subject: RE: I-D Working groups and mailing list > > (4) Others (probably a partially overlapping group with (3)) > just find more rules and requirements for more boilerplate > undesirable. They would (at least mostly) be happy if lots of > off-list notes went to authors of I-Ds for which the discussion > forum wasn't clear, asking them about the discussion forum and > recommending that it be included in the next draft. That might > actually encourage discussion and would be as, or more, > effective at retraining authors than more rules.
This is my preference. If the author(s) don't include a "discuss this here" section, then they're inviting direct comments, and maybe that's what they prefer. If not, they will quickly learn to either find or create a forum, even if that's just [email protected], and mention such in the draft. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
