On Aug 19, 2011, at 7:48 AM, Sam Hartman wrote: >>>>>> "Greg" == Greg Hudson <[email protected]> writes: > 87 > Greg> On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 08:53 -0400, [email protected] wrote: >>> I had always thought the same way as Sam, that clients would be >>> required to implement all of the options since there appears to >>> be no other way for them to support different disconnected token >>> types. The specification was intended to be token independent >>> and the assumption was always that the clients would also be. > > Greg> I agree, at least at the general level and for disconnected > Greg> tokens. (Does nextOTP make any sense for disconnected > Greg> tokens?) > > I think you prompt the person to hit the next value button
Or else wait for the time to roll-over to the next. ------------------------------------------------------ The opinions expressed in this message are mine, not those of Caltech, JPL, NASA, or the US Government. [email protected], or [email protected] _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
